INDUSTRIAL HEMP (Cannabis sativa) Part 2|
Author: Coffee Man
The passage of Bill C-8 in June 1996, resulted in the modification of the Canadian Drug Act decriminalizing the low () 9 tetrahydrocannabinol) ) 9 THC Cannabis, industrial hemp. The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) came into force on May 14 1997 replacing the Narcotic Control Act and Parts III and IV of the Food and Drugs Act and was published in March 12, 1998 (Health Canada 1998) to permit the commercial cultivation of industrial hemp in Canada. This put into place the appropriate regulations for commercial industrial hemp production for fibre and grain in Canada for prospective growers, researchers and processors. Thus, in 1998, industrial hemp was again legally grown under the new regulations as a commercial crop in Canada. These regulations allow for the controlled production, sale, movement, processing, exporting and importing of industrial hemp and hemp products that conform to conditions imposed by the regulations. The harvested hemp straw (free from foliage) is no considered a controlled substance. However, any harvested industrial hemp grain is considered a controlled substance until denatured. Therefore appropriate licenses must be obtained from Health Canada for purchase/movement of any viable seed, commercial field production (over 4 hectares), research and processing of viable grain. Any food products processed from industrial hemp seed must not exceed 10 ppm of delta 9 THC.
Health Canada is preparing a new draft for the review of the existing Industrial Hemp Regulations (Health Canada, 2001). To date this has not occurred. Speculations about new proposed regulation changes include clauses about volunteers, the status and disposal of "hemp dust", and a new, lower level of allowable delta 9 THC in hemp grain and derivatives. Health Canada is also anticipated in making changes to food labeling laws, all of which will have some positive impact on the marketing of industrial hemp. To date only the state of Hawaii has had licensed research activities in the United States and no other legal research or production exists in any other US states due to opposition by the federal government.
As of January 1, 2000, all seed planted for the production of industrial hemp in Canada must be of pedigreed status (certified, or better). This means that seed can no longer be imported from countries that are not members of one of the Seed Certification Schemes of which Canada is a member. Canada is a member of two schemes; the Organization for Economic Cooperation and the Development Seed Scheme administered by the Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies. Most of the seed of approved hemp fibre and seed varieties to be cultivated in Canada is of European varieties and is still produced in Europe requiring importation. Several European varieties have been licensed for seed production under private contracts in Canada. The first registered and licenced monoecious early grain variety (ANKA), bred and developed in Canada by Industrial Hemp Seed Development Company was commercially produced in Kent County, Ontario, in 1999. Certified seed availability of Health Canada approved varieties is published by Health Canada each year. Hence seed cost and availability will continue to be a major production cost (about 25-30%) until a viable industrial hemp certified seed production industry is established in Canada. At this time the following are Canadian bred, registered and certified varieties sold in Canada: ANKA (monoecious/dual purpose), Carmen (dioecious/fibre), Crag (dioecious/grain) and ESTA-1 (dioecious/grain).
delt 9 THC Management
The Cannabis genus is the only known plant in the plant kingdom that prduces Cannabinoids. The produced resin (psychoactive) is characterized in North America as marijuana. The Spanish introduced marijuana into the Americas in the 16th century. The well-known term, "marijuana", originated from the amalgamation of two Spanish abbreviations: "Rosa-Mari-a" and "Juan-IT-a"; frequent users of the plant at that time. By assimilation, the name "marijuana" in North America refers to any part of the Cannabis plant or extract there from, considered inducing psychic reaction in humans. Unfortunately the reference to "marijuana" frequently erroneously includes industrial hemp. The dried resinous exudate of Cannabis inflorescence is called "hashish". The highest glandular resin exudation occurs during flowering.
Small and Cronquist (1976), split the classification of Cannabis sativa into two subspecies: C. sativa subsp. sativa and C. sativa subsp. indica (Lam.) E. Small & Cronq. on the basis of less and greater than 0.3% (dry weight) of delta 9 THC in the upper (reproductive) part of the plant respectively. This classification has since been adopted in the European Community, Canada, and parts of Australia as the dividing line between cultivars that can be legally cultivated under license and forms that are considered to have too high a delta 9 THC drug potential.
Only cultivars with 0.3% delta 9 THC levels or less are approved for production in Canada. A list of approved cultivars (not based on agricultural merits but merely on basis of meeting delta 9 THC criteria) is published annually by Health Canada). A Canadian industrial hemp regulation system (see ‘Industrial Hemp Technical Manual’, Health Canada 1998) of rigidly monitoring the delta 9 THC content of commercial industrial hemp within the growing season has restricted hemp cultivation to cultivars that consistently maintain delta 9 THC levels below 0.3% in the plants and plant parts.
Environmental effects (soil characteristics, latitude, fertility and climatic stresses) have been demonstrated to effect delta 9 THC levels including seasonal and diurnal variations (Scheifele et al.1999; Scheifele and Dragla 2000; Small 1979, Pate 1998b). The range of delta 9 THC levels within low-delta 9 THC cultivars (< or = 0.3%) under different environmental effects is relatively limited by the inherent genetic stability (Scheifele et al. 1999; Scheifele & Dragla 2000). A few cultivars have been eliminated from the "Approved Health Canada" list because they have on occasion been identified to exceed the 0.3% level (Kompolti, Secuieni, Irene, Fedora 19, Futura) and Finola (FIN 314) and Uniko B are presently under probation because of detected elevated levels. Most of the "Approved Cultivars" have maintained relatively consistent low levels of delta 9 THC.
Hemp vs. Marijuana: Joseph W. Hickey, Sr., executive director of the Kentucky
Hemp Growers Cooperative Association, is quote: "Calling hemp and marijuana the same thing is like calling a rottweiler a poodle. They may both be dogs, but they just aren’t the same". Health Canada’s fact sheet on Regulations for the Commercial Cultivation of Industrial Hemp states: "Hemp usually refers to varieties of the Cannabis sativa L. plant that have a low content of delta-9 THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) and that are generally cultivated for fibre. Industrial hemp should not be confused with varieties of Cannabis with a high content of THC, which are referred to as marijuana". The leaves of industrial hemp and marijuana look similar but hemp can be readily distinguished from marijuana from a distance. The cultivation of marijuana consists of one to two plants per square meter and industrial hemp is cultivated in stands of 100 to 250 plants per square meter and plant characteristics are quite distinctively different (due to selective breeding). The established limits for THC content in the inflorescence of industrial hemp at time of mid pollen shedding is 0.3% (less than 1%) whereas levels of THC in marijuana are in the 10 to 20% range.
Present industrial hemp breeding programs apply strict screening at the early generation breeding level selecting only genotypes with less than 0.3% THC and then select for high fibre, stalk, grain quality and yield
It is impossible to "get high" on hemp. Hemp should never be confused with marijuana and the genetics for THC and Cannabinoid levels in hemp cannot be reversed even though over several generations of multiplication will creep into higher levels by several percentages, but never into marijuana levels. Feral hemp in Ontario, which has been under self propagation for 100 years or more has been tested (Baker 2003) and demonstrated to be very stable at <0.2% THC.
Agricultural Institute of Technology, Bornim. 2002. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Baker, John. 2001. Stonehedge Phytomedicinal Consulting Ltd. RR 4, Stirling, Ontario, Canada, K0K 3E0.
Baker, John. 2003. Stonehedge Phytomedicinal Consulting Ltd. RR 4, Stirling, Ontario, Canada, K0K 3E0.
Baxter, B. 2002. Personal Conversation. Feasibility Program Analyst Lead, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture & Food, 1 Stone Rd., Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 4Y2.
Baxter, B. and G. Scheifele. 2000. Growing Industrial Hemp in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Factsheet, Order No. 00-067, AGDEX 153/20. August 2000.
Becker, Helmuth. 2000. Flax/Hemp Paperworks & Press. 10835 Gold Creek Dr., RR4, Komoka, Ontario Canada. N0L 1R0. .
Callaway, J.C., T. Tennila, and D.W. Pate 1996. Occurrence of "omega-3" stearidonic acid (cis-6,9,12,15 octadecatetraenoic acid) in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Seed. Journal of the International Hemp Association 3(2):61-63).
CNF Ltd. 2001. Canadian Natural Fibres Ltd. RR1, Bailieboro, Ontario Canada. K0L 1B0. .
COFS. 1998. Canadian Outdoor Farm Show. Woodstock, Ontario Canada. .
Dragla, Peter. 2000. DG Test. Ridgetown College, Ridgetown, Ontario Canada, N0P 2C0. .
Elkerton, Peter. 2002. Georgian Highlands Co., Meaford, Ontario. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Fairfield, Gordon. 1999. Snowball Creek Wool Mill, 321 Fairview Dr., Suite 808, Brantford, Ontario, Canada. N3R 2X5. .
Fertig, M. 1996. Analysis of the Profitability of Hemp Cultivation for Paper. J. Int. Hemp Assoc. 3:42-43. (Review of a German M.Sc. Thesis).
Fleming, M.P. and R.C. Clarke. 1998. Physical evidence for the antiquity of Cannabis sativa L. Journal of International Hemp Association. 5:80-92.
Gall, Gary. 2002. Biofiber Research Inc. 314-610 Bullock Dr., Markham, Ontario Canada. L3R 0G1.
Gehl, D. 1995. A Summary of Hemp Research in Canada Conducted by the Fibre Division of Agriculture Canada. 1923-1942. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Indian Head, Sask.
Hanks, Art. 2002. Canada: Hemp Industry-In-Progress 1998-2002. Journal of Industrial Hemp. Vol. 7, No. 2, 2002. ISSN 1537-7881. pg 87-93.
Health Canada. 1998. Industrial Hemp Regulations. >
Health Canada. 2001. Canada Gazette, July 28, 2001.
Hempline Inc. 1998. Hempline Inc., 11157 Longwoods Rd., Delaware, Ontario Canada, N0L 1E0. .
Hempola Inc. 1998. Hempola Inc. 2133 Forbes Rd., RR1, Barrie, Ontario Canada. L4M 4Y8. .
Hill, Jim. 1998. Hill Agra Machinery. RR 3 Shelburn, Ontario Canada. L0N 1S7. .
Hinz, Herb. 1999. A Brief Analysis of Characteristics of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Seeds Grown in Northern Ontario in 1998. B.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Forestry, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Jones, K. 1995. Nutritional and Medicinal Guide to Hemp Seed. Rainforest Botanical laboratory, Gibson, Bc. 60 pp.
Karus, M., M. Kamp and D.Lohmeyer. 2000. Study on Markets and Prices for Natural Fibres (Germany and EU). 3rd International Symposium, Bioresource Hemp. Proceedings Bioresource Hemp 2000 & Other Fibre Crops. Error! Bookmark not defined. (by subsription).
KHG. 1998. Kawartha Hemp Company Ltd. RR 11, Peterborough, Ontario Canada. K9J 6Y3. .
Kenex Ltd. 1998. Kenex Ltd., RR 1, Pain Court, Ontario, Canada N0P 1Z0. .
Leson, G., P. Pless with J.W. Roulac 1999. Hemp Foods & Oils for Health. Hemptech.
McPartland, J.M., R.C. Clarke and D.P. Watson. 2000. Hemp Diseases and Pests. CABI Publishing. New York, N.Y.
Marcus, David. 2000. Naturalemphasis. 363 Sorauren Ave. #101, Toronto, Ontario Canada. M6R 2G5.
Marquis, Philippe. 1999. Experimental Culture of Industrial Hemp in Quebec. Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, J9X 5E4.
Mustafa, A.F., J.J. McKinnon, and D.A. Christensen. 1999. The Nutritive Value of Hemp Meal for Ruminants. Can.J. Anim. Sci. 79:91-95.
Nelson Thomson Learning. 2002. Explore Life. 1120 Birchmount Rd., Toronto, Ontario Canada. M1K 5G4. ISBN:0-03-022558-2
OHA. 2000. Ontario Hemp Alliance.
Osburn, L. 1992. Hemp seed: The Most Nutritionally Complete Food Source in the World. Hemp Line Journal 1:14-15.
Osburn L. 1998. Seed of Life. Hempworld 3(4):20-22.
Pate, D.W. 1998b. The Phytochemistry of Cannabis: its ecological and evolutionary implications. p.21-42. In: P. Ranalli (ed.), Advances in hemp research. Food Products Press (of Haworth Press), London, UK.
Przybylski, Roman. 1999. Utilization of Hemp Seed as Food and Feed Ingredients. University of Manitoba, Department of Foods and Nutrition, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2.
Rose, S.A., H.N. ElSohly, E.A. ElKashoury, and M.A. ElSohly. 1996. Fatty Acids of Cannabis Seeds. Phytochemical Analysis 7:279-283.
Rose, R. 1997. Hemp Foods Overview. .
Scheifele, L. 1995. Feasibility Studies for Growing Industrial Hemp in Southern Ontario, Canada. Ridgetown College Agricultural Technology, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada. 1995.
Scheifele, L. and P. Dragla. 1996. Research Report for Kent County, Ontario, Canada. Ridgetown College Agricultural Technology, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada. 1996
Scheifele, G.L. 1997. Exploring the Feasibility of Growing Industrial Low THC Hemp in Northwestern Ontario. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay. OSCIA Major Project Annual Report, February 1998.
Scheifele, G.L. 1998. Determining the Feasibility and Potential of Field Production of Low THC Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa) for Fibre and Seed Grain in Northern Ontario. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, Ontario. (search "Hemp").
Scheifele, G., H. Hinz, K. Davies, K. Calder, M. Bowman. 1999. 1998 Studies in
Determining the Genetic Stability, Environment and Latitude Effect on the
Levels of Delta-9 THC for Industrial Hemp Varieties. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, ON. 20 pp.
Scheifele, G.L. 1999. 1999 Comparison of Industrial Hemp Grain Composition for Oil, Protein, Fibre, Amino and Fatty Acids from Across Northern Ontario. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, Ontario. (search Hemp).
Scheifele, G.L. 2000A. 1999 Agronomic Field Studies to Determine Factors Effecting Hemp Stalk Production in Northern Ontario. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, Ontario. (search Hemp).
Scheifele, G.L. 2000B. 1999 Agronomic Field Studies to Determine Factors Effecting Hemp Grain Production in Northern Ontario. Kemptville College/University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, Ontario. (search Hemp).
Scheifele, G.L. 2000C. Delta 9 THC Levels in Hemp Grain and Oil from Northwestern Ontario in 1999. Kemptville College/ University of Guelph, Thunder Bay, Ontario. (search Hemp).
Scheifele, G.L., R. Przybylski and P. Dragla. 2000. Environment and Genetic Effect on Quality of Hemp Grain and oil Extracted from Grain Grown Across Northern Ontario (46th to 50th latitude and 80th to 94th longitude) in 1998 and 1999. 3rd International Symposium BIOSOURCE HEMP, Wolfsburg, Germany Sept. 13-16, 2000. . Error! Bookmark not defined. (by subsription).
Scheifele, G.L. and P. Dragla. 2000. Management of delta 9 THC Levels in Industrial Hemp Grown for Fibre and Grain in Ontario, Canada in 1995-1999. 3rd International Symposium BIOSOURCE HEMP, Wolfsburg, Germany Sept. 13-16. . Error! Bookmark not defined. (by subsription).
Scheifele, G.L. 2001. Agronomic Field Studies Across Northern Ontario, Canada from 1997 to 1999 Evaluating Factors Effecting Industrial Hemp Straw and Grain Production. Bast Fibrous Plants on the Turn of Second and Third Millennium, Shenyang City, China. Sept. 18-22, 2001. Section II pg. 1-7.
Scheifele, G.L. and P. Dragla. 2000. Environment and Genetic Effect on the Quality of Industrial Hemp Grain, Seed Cake and Oil Extracdted from Grain Grown Across Northern Ontario, Canada in 1998, 1999 and 2000. . 3rd International Symposium BIOSOURCE HEMP, Wolfsburg, Germany Sept. 13-16, 2000. Error! Bookmark not defined. (by subsription).
Schom, C. 1998. Industrial Hemp Growth Trials – New Brunswick. In Adaptive Research Reports, 1998, NB Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Fredericton, NB.
Schom, C. 1999. Industrial Hemp Growth Trials – New Brunswick. In Adaptive Research Reports, 1998, NB Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Fredericton, NB.
Schultes, R.E. 1970. Random Thoughts and Queries on the botany of Cannabis. P. 11-38. In: R.B. Joyce and S.H. Curry (eds.). The Botany and Chemistry of Cannabis. J.& A. Churchill, London, UK.
Shamai, Ruth. 1998. Ruth’s Hemp Foods Inc., PO Box 73, Station P, Toronto, Ontario Canada. M5S 2S6. .
Small, E. and A. Cronquist. 1976. A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon 25:405-435.
Small, E. and D. Marcus. 2000. Hemp germplasm Trials In Canada. 3rd International Symposium, Bioresource Hemp Proceedings of the "Bioresource Hemp 2000 and other Fibre Crops". Error! Bookmark not defined. (by subsription).
Small, E. and D. Marcus. 2002. Hemp: A New Crop with New Uses for North America. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Pg 284-326. J.Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
Weil, A. 1998. Therapeutic Hemp Oil. Ecology and Environment home page. .
Wirtshafter, J.D. 1998. Why Hemp Seeds? pp. 169-182 in Rosenthal E. (ed) Hemp Today. Quick American Archives, Oakland, CA. 444 pp.
TBHGA. 1999. Thunder Bay Hemp Grower’s Association. RR 6, Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada. P7C 5N5.
Article Source: http://www.myarticlepub.com - Free Reprint Articles
Submitted bySerenity Article Directory.
Submitted with Article Distributor.